|
Issuer Organization
|
Name / Description
|
Document
|
|
BIS CPSS-IOSCO Nov 2001
|
Recommendations
for securities settlement systems
The
19 recommendations and accompanying explanatory texts identify minimum
standards that securities settlement systems (SSSs) should meet. The
recommendations are designed to cover systems for all types of securities,
for securities issued in both industrialised and developing countries, and
for domestic as well as cross-border trades.
|

English

Español
|
|
BIS CPSS-IOSCO Nov 2002
|
Assessment
methodology for Recommendations for Securities Settlement Systems
The CPSS and the Technical Committee of IOSCO encourage national
authorities responsible for the regulation and oversight of SSSs to assess
whether markets in their jurisdiction have implemented the recommendations
and to develop action plans for implementation where necessary.
This report aims to set out a clear and comprehensive methodology for
use in these assessments. The methodology is primarily intended for use in
self-assessments by national authorities or in peer reviews of such
self-assessments. It is also intended to serve as guidance for the
international financial institutions (IFIs, ie the International Monetary
Fund and the World Bank) undertaking their Financial Sector Assessment
Program (FSAP) assessments and for other forms of technical assistance,
possibly including financing of reform efforts by the World Bank. In this
regard, IFIs took part in developing this assessment methodology.
|

English

Español
|
|
BIS CPSS-IOSCO Nov 2004
|
Recommendations
for Central Counterparties
This
report has 15 headline recommendations and accompanying explanatory text. The
recommendations cover the major types of risks CCPs face. The report sets out
the intended scope of application of these recommendations and their
relationship with the Task Force report on Recommendations for Securities
Settlement Systems (RSSS). The report also includes a methodology for
assessing implementation of the recommendations, which identifies key issues
and key questions and provides guidance on the assignment of an assessment
category
|

English

Español
|
|
BIS CPSS
Ene 2001
|
Core
Principles for Systemically Important Payment Systems
The
Core Principles are expressed deliberately in a general way to help ensure
that they can be useful in all countries and that they will be durable. They
do not represent a blueprint for the design or operation of any individual
system, but suggest the key characteristics that all systemically important
payment systems should satisfy. The second part of the report therefore
discusses in more depth the interpretation of the Core Principles, by giving
more detailed examples of issues to be addressed in complying with the Core
Principles and of ways in which these issues have been tackled in some
particular contexts
|

English

Español
|
|
BIS CPSS G10 Nov 2008
|
Statistics on payment and settlement systems in selected countries
This is an annual publication that provides data on
payments and payment systems in the CPSS countries.
This version of the statistical update contains data
for 2007 and earlier years. There are detailed tables for each individual
country as well as a number of comparative tables.
|

English
|
|
BIS
CGFC
Ene
2005
|
Stress testing at major financial institutions: survey results and
practice
In
May 2004, the Committee on the Global Financial System (CGFS) initiated an
exercise on stress tests undertaken by banks and securities firms. The
exercise had two main aims. The first was to conduct a review of what
financial institutions perceived to be the main risk scenarios for them at
that time, based on the type of enterprise-wide stress tests that they were
running. The second aim was to explore some of the more structural aspects of
stress testing and examine how practices had evolved, particularly over the
period since the previous CGFS survey.
|

English
|
|
BIS
CGFS
Jun
2007
|
Financial
stability and local currency bond markets
Local
currency bond markets can help financial stability by reducing currency
mismatches and lengthening the duration of debt. Such markets also help
economic efficiency by generating market-determined interest rates that
reflect the opportunity costs of funds at different maturities. The absence
of such markets can lead borrowers to take risky financing decisions that
create balance sheet vulnerabilities
|

English

Español
|
|
BIS
CGFS
Jul 2008
|
Central
bank operations in response to the financial turmoil
The
credit market turmoil that began in mid-2007 spilled over into a number of
major currency money markets in early August 2007. This in turn triggered a
variety of responses from central banks. Against this backdrop, the Committee
on the Global Financial System (CGFS), in cooperation with the Markets
Committee, convened a study group to examine how central banks adapted their
liquidity operations in response to the emergence of money market tensions
and how effective those responses were
|

English
|
|
BIS
CGFS
Mar
2001
|
Collateral
in wholesale financial markets: recent trends, risk management and market
dynamics
The use
of collateral has become one of the most important and widespread risk
mitigation techniques in wholesale financial markets. Financial institutions
extensively employ collateral in lending, in securities trading and
derivatives markets and in payment and settlement systems. Central banks
generally require collateral in their credit operations
|

English
|
|
BIS
BCBS
Jun
2004
|
Basel II: Revised international capital framework
The
Basel II Framework describes a more comprehensive measure and minimum
standard for capital adequacy that national supervisory authorities are now
working to implement through domestic rule-making and adoption procedures. It
seeks to improve on the existing rules by aligning regulatory capital
requirements more closely to the underlying risks that banks face. In
addition, the Basel II Framework is intended to promote a more
forward-looking approach to capital supervision, one that encourages banks to
identify the risks they may face, today and in the future, and to develop or
improve their ability to manage those risks. As a result, it is intended to
be more flexible and better able to evolve with advances in markets and risk
management practices.
|

English

Español
|